Labels:bulletin board | monitor | poster | reckoner | sky OCR: inmate's favor that the Petitioner's argument as t substantial deprivation" misses the there is no dispute to the detrimental effect of the statute, then the inquiry ends. Roller's entitlement to annual parole hearings after reaching his parole eligibility date statutory law in South Carolina at the time of his crime and sentencing such, it was "part of the law annexed to the crime at the time" of his offense Roller v Cavanaugh 984 F .2d at 122 from Schwartz Muncy 834 F.2d 396 398 n. 8 (4th Cir 1987)) Changing the law to require Roller to serve at least one additional year before parole reconsideration is a change in the quantum t0 punishment "We are tou willing to disparage the "substance' year especially year in prison. Roller at 123. This change while couched by the State "procedural, d ...
(.png)
